« Good HIV News? | Main | Johnny Cash and Cricket » 22 Mar 2006 06:56 pm Is "Waterboarding" Torture?The Wall Street Journal doesn't think so. Even those who offer token opposition to the practice imply that this kind of thing has happened in the past and we shouldn't take much notice of it. Here's an interesting transcript from a trial of Japanese interrogators after World War II, who "waterboarded" American detainees in captivity. The war crimes prosecutor is getting testimony from an American soldier who was waterboarded:
Here's the CIA's formal description of the waterboarding technique approved by president Bush for use in Guantanamo and in other secret CIA torture sites around the world:
Sound familiar? It's worth placing in the public record that the Bush administration's torture policies are, in this specific respect, the same as the Japanese dictatorship's in World War II. The American prosecutor at the time dismissed charges against the American serviceman whose testimony appears above on the following grounds: "The untrustworthiness of any admissions or confessions made under torture would clearly vitiate a conviction based thereon." How far we've sunk. And it took a Christian president, supported by Christian voters, to take us there. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200d8353d4d0553ef Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Is "Waterboarding" Torture?' |
