« The Blog-Left Versus Lieberman | Main | Bush-Cheney-Libby »

05 Jul 2006 03:56 pm

Global Warming Cant

Bob Samuelson, as so often, puts what I have been trying inelegantly to express much more directly:

From 2003 to 2050, the world's population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion people to 9.1 billion, a 42 percent increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (mainly, carbon dioxide) will be 42 percent higher in 2050. But that's too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. Unless we condemn the world's poor to their present poverty -- and freeze everyone else's living standards -- we need economic growth. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.

Even the most drastic measures from Western nations will not make much more than a dent in this. Only an energy technological breakthrough can. I'd ratchet up gas taxes to see what the market will throw up in innovation (and for national security reasons). But then I'd channel resources into adjusting to global warming, rather than trying to prevent it. If the technology comes through and we can really do something to heal the planet in time, I'm all for it. Until then, a lot of this debate is, as Samuelson says, posturing. Or have I and Samuelson missed something?

Share This

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200d83432a16953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Global Warming Cant'

Is it getting hot in here or is just me.
Excerpt: Well it seems as though everyone is talking about this essay in the Washington Post by Robert Samuelson, so I might as well add my own two cents. First off, Samuelson makes the same point that I always make when I argue with Global Warming Crusaders, n...
Weblog: jasam.net
Tracked: Jul 6, 2006 6:05:42 AM