« TwitterVision | Main | The Lies of Gonzales »

19 Mar 2007 04:37 pm

Another Bush Lie

I've been conned again by the Bush administration. One reason I was skeptical of the surge was its very low troop levels. I couldn't see how a mere 17,500 new troops would change the dynamic in any meaningful way. And it hasn't. Yes, we've seen some calm in Baghdad, as Shiite militias lie low, but we've also seen stepped up Sunni violence in Baghdad's periphery. Now, in response to "whack-a-mole," it appears that Petraeus wants another full brigade. When you add that to the extra 4,600 announced March 10, the surge is now just shy of 30,000 more troops. Rich Lowry claims vindication. Huh? The only vindication is that Lowry believed that Bush was lying back in January, and Lowry, it appears, was right. Why did Bush "low-ball," i.e. deceive us about the numbers? My best bet is that he thought if he actually told people we'd be sending 30,000 more troops (and maybe more), Americans would balk. I would have been more impressed, of course, and more inclined to support it. But this is beside the point. The point is:  why is it beyond this president to tell the truth to the American people in wartime?

Share This

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200d83434cd3453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Another Bush Lie'

More Hysteria from Sullivan
Excerpt: Andrew Sullivan has become apoplectic because the surge in Iraq, which was originally supposed to be composed of about 21,500 additional troops, is now pegged to be about 30,000 because 4,700 support troops were added last week and, according to the Bosto
Weblog: The New Editor
Tracked: Mar 19, 2007 5:10:12 PM

Video of the Day
Excerpt: See Sullivan. ...
Weblog: chrislejeune.com
Tracked: Mar 19, 2007 6:11:09 PM