|
« In Praise of Insensitivity | Main | Hollywood For Ugly People » 18 Apr 2007 12:11 pm How Many Children Should You Have?[Ross] Tyler Cowen speculates, with an assist from some recent social-science research. Its upshot:
Europe seems to have this pretty well figured out. And I don't mean to be flip - the European "let's stop at one" approach to childbearing really is well-calculated to maximize a certain kind of parental well-being, narrowly defined. Of course, it's also calculated to seriously diminish the "subjective well-being" of all the second and third children who don't get conceived because their parents decided it wasn't worth the trouble. And while the theory that parents have children "either for the benefit of the firstborn or because they reason that if the first child made them happy, the second one will, too" may be true in many or even most cases, it also reflects a certain degree of deplorable solipsism. The chief reason parents should take on the trouble of conceiving and raising a child is that the child is a good in and of itself - one of the greatest goods there is, in fact, in any moral scheme worth considering - not because they think that it will make them or their already-existing offspring happier. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2224950/17823310 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'How Many Children Should You Have?' |