« The View From Your Window | Main | Towelie Day! »
No Surrender
20 Apr 2007 02:55 pm
[Ross] So Harry Reid announced that he thinks the war in Iraq is "lost," prompting general outrage on the right - capped off by Mark Levin's call for Reid's resignation:
His legislative efforts to starve our armed forces in the middle of a war are as contemptible as anything I’ve witnessed in my 25 years in Washington. And yesterday he made a statement that was so disgraceful and brazen that it could have been uttered by Tokyo Rose during World War II or Jane Fonda during the Vietnam War. The difference, of course, is that Reid is the highest ranking Democrat in the United States Senate.
So, Reid announces to our brave volunteers that their country is sending them to a lost war. And he announces to our enemy that victory is within their reach — just keep up the killing a little longer . . .
Rather than join the chorus demanding Gonzales's resignation, let me be the first to demand Reid's resignation. And let's see how many pundits, conservative and otherwise, will join me.
Here's my question: Is there any imaginable point in any imaginable conflict where Mark Levin would admit that the United States had lost a war? I don't mean to be flip, and I say this as someone who generally thinks that the U.S. hasn't necessarily lost in Iraq; we probably have, but the outcome is still sufficiently in doubt and the stakes sufficiently high that I want to give the "surge," however ineffectual it may prove (or may already be proving), at least a Tom Friedmanesque six months to work. But even allowing that Reid shouldn't have said what he said, it's still the case that the United States can lose wars, like any world power; that we may well lose this one (in some sense, at least); and that at some point, in this struggle or another, some American politician will say "we've lost the war" and be entirely correct. Given this reality, I wish Levin (and many of his fellow "till the last dog dies" Iraq War backers) would clarify whether there's any situation in which they would greet a U.S. defeat abroad with any response save a rote invocation of the stab-in-the-back narrative.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2224950/17881894
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'No Surrender'
Sullivan Doesn't Get It
Excerpt: Along with joining in the call for Harry Reid's resignation, I want to address Andrew Sullivan's question:I wish Levin (and many of his fellow till the last dog dies Iraq War backers) would clarify whether there's any situation in which
Weblog: Riehl World View
Tracked: Apr 20, 2007 9:20:53 PM
The Confused Lexicon of the "War" in Iraq
Excerpt: Harry Reid's comment that the "war is lost" has prompted plenty of legitimate debate about what it means to "win" or "lose" a war.
Andrew Sullivan weighs in:
Here's my question: Is there any imaginable point in any imaginable conflict where Mark Lev
Weblog: The New Editor
Tracked: Apr 22, 2007 4:57:48 PM
