« Face of the Day | Main | From Jim Fallows' Window In China »

26 Jul 2007 02:58 pm

Hillary and Executive Power

There's not much reason to believe she'd be much less authoritarian in the White House than Bush and Cheney. Steve Chapman makes the libertarian non-interventionist case against another president Clinton:

When she ran for the Senate in 2000, she mocked Republicans (such as Caspar Weinberger and Colin Powell) who think "we should intervene with force only when we face splendid little wars that we surely can win, preferably by overwhelming force in a relatively short period of time." On the contrary, she said, we "should not ever shy away from the hard task if it is the right one."

As Michael Crowley of The New Republic has noted, she had another reason for supporting Bush on Iraq. "I'm a strong believer in executive authority," she said in 2003. "I wish that, when my husband was president, people in Congress had been more willing to recognize presidential authority."

There you have it. A Hillary Clinton presidency promises to unite Madeleine Albright's zeal for using bombs in pursuit of liberal ideals with Dick Cheney's vision of the president as emperor. Won't that be fun?

Share This

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e3932fff068834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Hillary and Executive Power'

Blurring Terms
Excerpt: There is, in fact, a difference between authoritarianism and interventionism. They can go hand in hand or one can appear in solitude, but they are not the same, nor is one a prerequisite for the other.
Weblog: Steven White
Tracked: Jul 26, 2007 3:07:49 PM