« Quote For The Day | Main | The Danger Of Rudy »

24 Oct 2007 12:38 pm

Bush's ENDA Veto

The president's threat to veto a bill that provides employment protections for gay employees draws this response from Dale Carpenter:

Whether Bush will actually veto the bill if it ever reaches his desk is unknown. The reasons given for a veto by OMB seem transparently thin, which suggests either that they're a sop to religious conservatives and that Bush may sign ENDA anyway or that they're a pretext for deep political concerns Congress simply won't be able to allay while Bush is president. It's still worth it for political reasons to pass a bill the President may well veto, just as it was politically advantageous (according to gay groups) to pass the seemingly doomed Hate Crimes bill. But a dose of cold realism about the law's prospects until at least 2009 has now been added to the mix.

Chris Crain adds:

I continue to believe there is a strong likelihood the president will not veto either the (trans-inclusive) hate crimes bill or ENDA (so long as it's not trans-inclusive), should either reach his desk -- whether solo or attached to some larger piece of legislation.  The veto threat was an easy political move to satisfy conservative rabble rousers, and in ENDA's case seemed a direct response to the LaBarbera rally cry.

Of course, the United ENDA trans-first'ers still have a chance to beat President Bush's advisers to the punch, and derail historic gay rights legislation because it doesn't also expressly protect transsexuals, cross-dressers and transvestites as well.  If they succeed, whether in the House or by scaring the Senate away from the legislation, the president will owe them a debt of gratitude.

Share This

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e54efdb3148833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Bush's ENDA Veto'

ENDA Postoned
Excerpt: The Enemy has not yet commented on the ENDA meltdown because, in all honesty, The Enemy is not sure where he comes down on the issue. On the one hand, yes, it seems to be the height of perversity to
Weblog: Enemy
Tracked: Oct 24, 2007 2:55:11 PM