« The "Televised Book" |
Main
| Clarence Thomas and Polarization »
04 Oct 2007 06:33 am
Malkin Award Nominee
Well, maybe Althouse deserves her own special award for reliable loopiness. Here's her latest on Clinton's cackle:
"I think it was her strategy to make us talk about that instead of substantive problems she has. It's a distraction. She's deliberately laughing in a way designed to derail us from going in a direction that would hurt her. (So was the cleavage.)"
She's devious, but not that devious. And it hurt her. Which is why we will never hear it again.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e54eefb37c8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Malkin Award Nominee'
The Hillary laugh debate
Excerpt: After Jon Stewart mocked Hillary Clinton's laughter during interviews, Patrick Healy wrote an entire New York Times article about "The Cackle" that has now launched a mini-frenzy of coverage, including a "body language expert" calling it "evil laughter...
Weblog: Brendan Nyhan
Tracked: Oct 4, 2007 9:21:32 AM
