« Against Obama And Paul | Main | From Oy To Ow » 16 Nov 2007 10:21 am The Pro-Torture Right , Politics"> , Republicans"> , Torture">
The use of torture is fast becoming a core principle of today's Republican party. My sense is that many in the base are uncomfortable with the defensiveness of the Bush people, and their use of euphemism in this respect. And so the NYT #1 Bestselling author is unabashed in his support of using Gestapo methods against terror suspects, seized without due process and tortured under presidential authority. Yes, of course he's endorsing Giuliani. Who else will do what the quisling, gutless liberals won't? Here is the Hannity-style argument:
Give them Geneva protections if they are caught on the battlefield, and interrogate them legally. Or if they are seized in the US, they remain covered by the Constitution. Is that so hard to grasp? Meanwhile, here are two more pro-torture pieces in the Washington Times: Murdock's open celebration of torture, and Mona Charen's astonishing two sentences:
Indeed. When we live under a presidential protectorate, it really is up to one man to make a subjective judgment, isn't it? Even though no international body and no American precedents even question whether waterboarding is torture, the law is suddenly imprecise. It seems to me that the pro-torture right needs to make this explicit: legalize waterboarding explicitly, and withdraw from the Geneva Conventions, and the relevant UN Treaty. If resistance to America becoming a torturing nation is mere "moral preening" why not just get the Congress to do what the Republican base wants? It's far more honest than voting for Giuliani in the sure knowledge that he will torture any terror suspect he can get his hands on, while pretending that America is still the same country it was before 9/11. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e54f97e77f8834 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'The Pro-Torture Right' |
