« Against The "Buddy System" |
Main
| Romney's Delegate Count »
09 Jan 2008 10:57 pm
By Hand Or Diebold?
I'm not an expert on this, but is there an obvious explanation for why Obama had a 7.5 percent advantage over Clinton in New Hampshire votes counted by hand and Clinton had a 5.5 percent advantage in votes counted by machine? I presume that it's a function of differing locations, with the more urban Clinton districts relying more on machines. Is that the right inference?
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e54fda8cc18834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'By Hand Or Diebold?'
