The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan

« What Obama Could Not Say | Main | Yglesias Award Nominee »

Defending Bill Clinton

22 Mar 2008 06:26 am

You may want to sit down, but I read the following Bill Clinton remarks yesterday and didn't see anything untoward about them:

"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country," said Clinton, who was speaking to a group of veterans Friday in Charlotte, N.C. "And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

I don't think he's implying that Obama doesn't love his country or is not devoted to the interest of this country (although you could, with some strain, parse it that way). He's actually hoping for a substantive, non-swift-boating, non-Coulter, non-Hannity campaign. It's pretty close to my own hope for an Obama-McCain race. Now why Clinton didn't include Obama, who is the current front-runner, and who has shown an ability to speak and talk constructively and civilly for the entire campaign, is an interesting question, isn't it? He's certainly less divisive than he or his wife. And he has just shown an ability to respond to swift-boating not by the usual Clinton defensive crouch but by tackling it head-on and winning the argument.

I think the statement just speaks to Clinton's staggering sense of ownership of the Democratic party and the unconcious assumption that his wife deserves to be the nominee. I still think the Clintons cannot believe the gall of anyone daring to challenge their power or their specious self-regard. I've said it before, but imagine if Clinton had won over a dozen primaries in a row, was ahead in the delegate count, ahead in the popular vote, and way ahead in the number of states won. Don't you think the pressure on Obama to pull out would be enormous? And wouldn't Clinton regard his persistence as treachery? And yet Clinton in the exact same situation carries on, with a minimal chance of victory,and actually had the gall to offer Obama a veep slot. Who on earth does she think she is? At best it's pure Clinton entitlement. At worst it's white entitlement.

Oh, well, I tried to defend the Clintons and look where I ended up. Better luck next time.

(Photo: Win McNamee/Getty.)

Permalink :: Trackback (4) :: Sphere It!

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2224950/27341980

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Defending Bill Clinton'

Dept of Desperate Diversions: Obama Aide Compares Bill Clinton to Joseph McCarthy
Excerpt: Posted by Damozel |Here's what Clinton said to some North Carolina veterans:I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country...And people could...
Weblog: Buck Naked Politics
Tracked: Mar 22, 2008 7:32:44 PM

Is it 'White Entitlement' to Propose that Obama Take the VP Slot?
Excerpt: In a post that I also addressed here, Andrew Sullivan brings up one of the sillier and most self-defeating arguments to come from Obama's supporters (and AS now seems as committed to Obama as he was once committed to Bush and the Iraq War):I still thin...
Weblog: Buck Naked Politics
Tracked: Mar 23, 2008 9:11:58 AM

Obama's Advisers: Less Progressive than Advertised?
Excerpt: Posted by Damozel | My, Barack Obama's advisers and officials are contributing quite a little heap of embarrassments to his campaign, aren't they? First, there was Austan Goolsbee's little chat with the Canadians about NAFTA (Obama didn't mean it) that...
Weblog: Buck Naked Politics
Tracked: Mar 23, 2008 10:48:12 AM