« Scrapping FCS? | Main | What Foreign Policy Experience? » 11 Mar 2008 03:26 pm O'Hanlon On IraqHe is arguing for a middle way between Obama's and McCain's campaign positions:
But here is the critical caveat:
My emphasis. So how do we provide a real message of tough love if the Iraqis know and we know and they know we know that a decade more is about the minimum required to construct something like a non-failed state in Iraq - and even then, it is a highly dubious project? That's why this is so hard: because the middle ground is far more expensive and open-ended than anyone has so far explained candidly to the American people. It seems to me that those who favor withdrawal need to be honest about the conflict that would follow and argue how we can live with it, or play it to our advantage. And those who insist we should stay until Iraq exists as a unitary non-despotic country have to be honest about the decades-long effort this will require. Maybe then we can conduct this debate more intelligently. And that's one more reason to hope the primary season won't stretch into the summer. The bigger debate between McCain and Obama is one we all need. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e550ec5e968833 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'O'Hanlon On Iraq' |
