« Massage Pants |
Main
| From Dormont, Pennsylvania »
17 Apr 2008 08:49 pm
In Defense Of ABC News
Philip Klein argues that after 21 debates, many of which focused on policy, it was time to engage the Democrats with classic swift-boat GOP attacks. I can see why this might appeal to those of us who have had to watch a large number of these debates. I can see why Stephanopoulos and Gibson like the idea of making news by channeling Karl Rove. I can even see the point if this were a debate for super-delegates, focused entirely on electability through the Morris-Rove prism. But it was actually a debate before a primary of regular voters. And call me pious if you wish, but I still retain some sliver of a belief that in such a debate, it is the job - even the civic duty - of moderators to ask tough questions about substantive issues. These debates are not for a bored media elite. They are designed to help voters decide who to vote for. This one didn't.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e551f359ba8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'In Defense Of ABC News'
