« Was Rubin Distorting? |
Main
| The Vice-President For Torture »
17 May 2008 10:37 am
It's About Choice, Stupid
A reader writes:
One thing that I think is lost in the discussion about the California
decision is the implicit rejection by the court (by primarily invoking
Loving) that sexual orientation is by and large a choice. For some, it
can be (like exploring bi-sexuality). But, by and large, sexual
orientation is a culmination of the nature of our beings. Is there a
nurture (environmental) element in our decisions related to our sexual
orientation? Sure. I'm heterosexual but I also recognize that some of
my preferences and lifestyle are/were driven by my experiences as a
young adult. Distinguishing between a sexual culture and orientation
might be useful in discussing this. That doesn't change the fact that
my orientation is hetero. I've never spent a moment contemplating the
idea that it was a choice, why should homosexuals be painted with the
same brush?
The California decision reduces the concept of gay marriage to two
things. First, as in Loving, there is a fundamental right in our
society (at least California's) to marry. Second, sexual orientation,
at its basic level, is not a choice. The decision by California to
reject the ban on gay marriage, in spite of the strict scrutiny
applied, affirms both of these principles.
Now its just a matter of the rest of the US waking up to these truths.
And the only advantage that I have in all this is that I know this to be true - more surely than I know almost anything.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e5522b60b18833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'It's About Choice, Stupid'