« Benedict Weighs In | Main | It's About Choice, Stupid » 17 May 2008 09:53 am Was Rubin Distorting?The McCain campaign has been pushing back on the Rubin argument that McCain once supported talking to Hamas and now says such a position is "unacceptable." Here's the full quote that allegedly exposes Rubin:
I'd say any fair assessment would show that McCain was intelligently prepared to see whether the US could talk to Hamas, if there could be ways to engage with them. If their behavior made that fruitless, then we shouldn't bother. That sounds perfectly sensible to me, the kind of politics McCain used to be known for, both realistic and pragmatic, and it is clearly not the rigid posture that dialogue with governments like Hamas is always unacceptable. This new position is obviously part of an attempt to paint Obama as unfit for the presidency. It's Rovian bullshit. And, of course, with respect to Hamas, there is no daylight between Obama's position and McCain's. The only difference is with Iran. I doubt there's any way to talk to Ahmadinejad, if he's still around next year, but Khameini may be different, and other power-centers in Tehran may be different. It would be great to have a president again able to use diplomacy intelligently and pragmatically, with the leverage of military force behind him, prepared to exploit internal divisions within enemy regimes. Both McCain and Obama have this potential, but McCain has now decided to follow Bush and rule it out. That's a pity. Does he really believe Bush's intransigence has been a success? TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e5522ccb858833 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Was Rubin Distorting?' |
