« Not The First Time |
Main
| The Obama 40 »
23 May 2008 07:00 pm
Wrong About 1992 As Well
From the New York Times in March of that year:
Mr. Clinton is already close to the halfway mark in the number of
delegates needed to win the nomination and has a 7-to-1 edge over Mr.
Brown, who is running a maverick, anti-establishment campaign. Many
Democrats said that barring an unexpected collapse by Mr. Clinton's
campaign, it is difficult to see how Mr. Brown can overtake the
Governor.
"It certainly brings it much closer to a conclusion,"
said Ronald H. Brown, the Democratic national chairman. "You could
argue that it's theoretically possible for Jerry Brown to mount a
come-from-behind challenge, but the math and the reality of Bill
Clinton's momentum certainly work against him."
Yes, the Clintons once used the math argument against an opponent - as early as March 20, only a couple of weeks after New Hampshire. Brown could have rallied in his home state of California, but it was effectively over long before then. The Clintons will say anything, deny anything, refute themselves, contradict themselves - as long as it helps them gain power. They have no other point of reference.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e55279cfb68833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Wrong About 1992 As Well'
Hillary's bogus 1968 and 1992 comparisons
Excerpt: The firestorm over Hillary Clinton's mention of the RFK's assassination seems overblown to me -- I don't see any reason to believe she was bringing it up to suggest that Barack Obama would be assassinated. The problem is the misleading
Weblog: Brendan Nyhan
Tracked: May 27, 2008 10:10:39 AM