« Cookie Cutter Campaign Ads |
Main
| The View From Your Window »
22 Jun 2008 12:42 pm
Interrogating KSM Et Al.
A fascinating, and amazingly detailed account of how we got Khaled Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah to cooperate on intelligence. Maddeningly, we will never know for sure what we could have found out without torture. But we do find that these terror suspects - hardcore Islamists - are not a totally different kind of enemy than we have ever encountered in the past. They are human beings, and capable of responding to traditional interrogation techniques:
Senior Federal Bureau of Investigation
officials thought such methods unnecessary and unwise. Their agents got
Abu Zubaydah talking without the use of force, and he revealed the
central role of Mr. Mohammed in the 9/11 plot. They correctly predicted
that harsh methods would darken the reputation of the United States and
complicate future prosecutions. Many C.I.A. officials, too, had their
doubts, and the agency used contract employees with military experience
for much of the work.
Some C.I.A. officers were torn, believing
the harsh treatment could be effective. Some said that only later did
they understand the political cost of embracing methods the country had
long shunned.
There is no absolute proof here of either contention. But if Khaled Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah gave useful intelligence when interrogated by a man who did not even speak their language but won their trust, it seems to me that the case for abandoning the West's self-defining strictures on torture and prisoner-abuse is extremely weak. It is a very good thing that the next president will renounce it.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e55382b5c98834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Interrogating KSM Et Al.'
