« Heaven As An Amusement Park |
Main
| Google Pundit »
07 Jun 2008 11:35 am
Judicial Activism In History
From Arthur Sutherland's 1954 article on segregation and the Supreme Court:
Man has never succeeded in defining justice, and this is well; any definition might exclude what he would later wish to preserve. But the Supreme Court had no trouble in deciding on what was not justice; it was not justice to exclude the Negro child from the school where the white children could go. And that judgment day was a great day. As I write, the papers are full of reports of governors calling together educational commissions to consider what shall be done; and in two or three states there are reported a few—surprisingly few—hurt and indignant utterances from public officials. This is not remarkable. For generations men have felt deeply and resentfully about this matter. People against whom any court decides are apt to be exasperated, and say things in immediate hurt which a little later they realize they do not wholly mean.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e552e7c87e8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Judicial Activism In History'
Reliance and RICO Fraud - Hope for Franchisees
Excerpt: Image via WikipediaThe United States Supreme Court delivered a very important decision regarding the element of reliance in a RICO cause of action. "RICO provides...
Weblog: THE BIZOP NEWS
Tracked: Jun 12, 2008 10:31:10 AM