« Carville's Short Memory |
Main
| Dahlia On Michelle »
26 Aug 2008 11:57 am
Petraeus vs McCain
It's the difference between a sober empirical judgment and a hotheaded partisan boast. From Newsweek:
Petraeus is careful not to credit all the progress to the surge of U.S. troops in 2007. The sea change came last year from a series of movements now known as the Awakening. […] So would the Sunni Awakening have succeeded without the surge? Possibly, he concedes.
And McCain:
COURIC: Sen. Obama […] says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What’s your response to that?
McCAIN: I don’t know how you respond to something that is such a false depiction of what actually happened.
Notice the accusation of a lie when Obama is actually telling the nuanced truth, exactly as Petraeus did. Do we really need another commander-in-chief who cannot see complexity in the Middle East? And who turns military facts into partisan propaganda?
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e200e55477a9728834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Petraeus vs McCain'
