« "The Most Bigoted Decision In National Electoral Politics" | Main | Les Deux Exces Se Touchent »

27 Sep 2008 03:42 pm

1960, 1980, 1992 ... 2008?

Fallows's final assessment:

When the details of this encounter fade, as they soon will, I think the debate as a whole will be seen as of a piece with Kennedy-Nixon in 1960, Reagan-Carter in 1980, and Clinton-Bush in 1992.

I'm with Jim. I have a feeling this was it. Fallows continues:

In each of those cases, a fresh, new candidate (although chronologically older in Reagan's case) had been gathering momentum at a time of general dissatisfaction with the "four more years" option of sticking with the incumbent party. The question was whether the challenger could stand as an equal with the more experienced, tested, and familiar figure. In each of those cases, the challenger passed the test -- not necessarily by "winning" the debate, either on logical points or in immediate audience or polling reactions, but by subtly reassuring doubters on the basic issue of whether he was a plausible occupant of the White House and commander in chief.

I think that's how this debate will be seen.

Permalink :: Trackback (0) :: Sphere It! ::

Share This