« Why Palin Still Matters, Ctd. |
Main
| "Whack-Job" »
13 Nov 2008 11:11 am
The Windfall Tax Danger
Robert Rapier disagrees with parts of Obama's energy plan:
The oil industry does make big profits, but they are also already one of the most heavily taxed industries. And their tax payments to governments increase along with their profits. There has been a lot of coverage given to the record profits being made by the oil companies, but much less to the record windfalls in the form of taxes that governments have received over the past few years as a result.
And don't forget that we have experimented with a windfall profits tax
before. It raised far less revenue than anticipated, and caused
investment to fall...
I don't think there is any doubt that a windfall profits tax won't help
add to supplies. And refunding it back to consumers sends the wrong
message: If gas prices go up, the government will protect you by taking
the money from the oil companies and giving it back to you. Where is
the incentive for the consumer to conserve? For the oil companies
themselves, the likely impact would be that foreign earnings wouldn't
be repatriated back to the U.S., and would just be reinvested overseas.
For that matter, a steep windfall profits tax would provide incentive
for U.S. oil companies to simply relocate overseas.
Look: Palin is for windfall taxes. Obama shouldn't be.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e2010535e943f6970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'The Windfall Tax Danger'