« Broadcasting A Death |
Main
| Sexting, Ctd. »
11 Dec 2008 03:29 pm
Good War, Bad War
By Patrick Appel
From Michael Crowley's article on Afghanistan:
For the left in the Bush era, America's two wars have long been divided into the good and the bad. Iraq was the moral and strategic catastrophe, while Afghanistan--home base for the September 11 attacks--was a righteous fight.
This dichotomy was especially appealing
to liberals because it allowed them to pair their call for withdrawal
from Iraq with a call for escalation in Afghanistan. Leaving Iraq
wasn't about retreating; it was about bolstering another front, one
where our true strategic interests lie. The left could meet
conservative charges of defeatism with the rhetoric of victory. Barack
Obama is now getting ready to turn this idea into policy. He has
already called for sending an additional two U.S. brigades, or roughly
10,000 troops, to the country and may wind up proposing a much larger
escalation in what candidate Obama has called "the war we need to win." [...]
The challenge of exiting Iraq was supposed to be the first great
foreign policy test of Obama's presidency. But it is Afghanistan that
now looms as the potential quagmire. Winning the good war will, at a
minimum, require the most sophisticated counterinsurgency techniques...which take enormous resources.
But, even then, it's not at all clear what victory looks like, or
whether it's even possible in a country known as the graveyard of
empires. All of which raises the question of how much longer
Afghanistan really can be considered the good war.
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e2010536538f61970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Good War, Bad War'