« Confirming What We Already Knew II |
Main
| Dissent Of The Day II »
12 Dec 2008 01:57 pm
The Art Of The Interview
By Patrick Appel
A reader writes:
I
think Colbert does better interviews than Stewart. Stewart's
interviews are usually, but not always, too cautious when he's talking
to someone he disagrees with, but his real weakness is with people he
agrees with, where his interviews are basically boring. Colbert is most
interesting with people his character disagrees with, since he'll ask
people really good questions that they should be able to answer, and
which they're usually unprepared for. From where I sit, going
mano-a-mano with Colbert looks a lot harder.
Another reader makes a related point:
John Stewart is not a great interviewer because he has a
double standard: Hiding behind the excuse that it’s not his job to ask
hard-hitting questions when it’s a guest he wants to coddle, lobbing them
nothing but softball questions. But swinging away with satire, sarcasm and
tough questions for guests he and his audience oppose. He used to be more cloaked,
but the Bush years and the corresponding rise in popularity of liberalism seem
to have emboldened him to be openly biased.
But since Huckabee and others know the game and still do the
show, who can blame him for continuing the bit?
Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e20105365706b7970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'The Art Of The Interview'