« "The Most Dangerous Man" | Main | The Future Of Books » 23 Jan 2009 03:03 pm Brownback's Lamest Reason Yetby Chris Bodenner
Of the more than 1,000 officers who cycle through CGSC every year, only about 50 of them are foreign, and only a fraction of them come from Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. While any disruption to CGSC's curriculum is unfortunate, a few-person boycott would pale in comparison to the issue of our detainee policy and how the rest of the world sees it. But first of all, why exactly would these countries refuse to let their students come? Brownback never says. Local leaders, who first invoked the excuse, also don't elaborate (at least as far I've read). Is it because foreign students would object to our detainee policy? But wouldn't it be completely different at that point, by virtue of closing Guantanamo and giving detainees a fair hearing? And if that is the case, why aren't they protesting now? If, on the other hand, those foreign students are concerned about personal safety, then that seems legitimate (though odd that it's only those countries and not others). Unless someone can explain to me how important these alleged boycotts are, Brownback should stick to his security concerns, which are plenty serious on their own. His expertise on the detainee issue is crucial to the ongoing debate and the safety of Leavenworth, so I feel like these sort of minor reasons are distracting. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e2010536f19a2d970c Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Brownback's Lamest Reason Yet' |
