« Star Wars | Main | Healing Versus Curing » 22 Jan 2009 03:44 pm Views On The Groundby Chris Bodenner How about the Leavenworth Times? After all, it's the paper most likely to reflect the views of Kansans most affected by a detainee transfer to Ft. Leavenworth. Let's take a look:
And those aren't the exception; the overwhelming majority of reader comments support the transfer. And they weren't written by bloggers like Geraghty and me, but rather a retired Army sergeant, a federal retiree who helped build the Army prison, and a retired Navy vet, respectively. (I know because I contacted them for a magazine piece.) Another example is my father, a Vietnam vet who retired at the fort and still lives in Leavenworth. In fact, even excluding the fort, more than one-fifth of area residents have served in the military (double the national figure). Servicemembers, by definition, risk a bit of their own safety to protect the higher principles of our democracy. So it's no surprise that many veterans feel it's their patriotic duty to help tackle the detainee problem (particularly since Ft. Leavenworth has the only maximum-security prison in the military, and the area -- home to four major prisons -- has dealt with some of the most dangerous inmates of the past century, such as the terrorist who rented the truck used in the first WTC attack.) So while Geraghty suggests that Obama is ignoring local politicians, those politicians need to listen more closely to their own constituents. The local debate, at least in Leavenworth, is far more nuanced than NIMBY. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e2010536ecd8c6970c Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Views On The Ground' |
