« A New Marriage Poll In California | Main | The Far Right vs Freeman » 10 Mar 2009 05:27 pm The Freeman PrecedentThere are a couple of things worth noting about this minor, yet major, Washington spat. The first is that the MSM has barely covered it as a news story, and the entire debate occurred in the blogosphere. I don't know why. But that would be a very useful line of inquiry for a media journalist. The second is that Obama may bring change in many areas, but there is no possibility of change on the Israel-Palestine question. Having the kind of debate in America that they have in Israel, let alone Europe, on the way ahead in the Middle East is simply forbidden. Even if a president wants to have differing sources of advice on many questions, the Congress will prevent any actual, genuinely open debate on Israel. More to the point: the Obama peeps never defended Freeman. They were too scared. The fact that Obama blinked means no one else in Washington will ever dare to go through the hazing that Freeman endured. And so the chilling effect is as real as it is deliberate. When Obama told us that the resistance to change would not end at the election but continue every day after, he was right. But he never fought this one. He's shrewder than I am. TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e2011168d14be3970c Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'The Freeman Precedent'
Freeman Withdraws Nomination for National Intelligence Council
The msm on the freeman withdrawal |
